Category
- Products
-
- Solar Energy
- FAQ
- Solar Photovoltaic
- Contact us
Inverter manufacturer
buy@inverter.co
tech@inverter.co
Home » Solar inverters » Differences between String inverter and Central inverter
Differences between String inverter and Central inverter
Tags: String inverter, Central inverter
Using string inverters instead of central inverters for big power plants is a totally different concept, that affects to the whole management of the PV plant in some aspects:
Designing: with multi-MPPT string concept a better management of the shades is obtained. If lower row of the structure is connected to a different MPPT than upper rows, you can place structures closer, obtaining a best ratio of W/m2. Furthermore, cabins are smaller (and provoke less shadow) and marginal areas of the ground can be used (if the inverter is flexible enough), thus more panels can be installed in the same area, peaking down the costs (€/Wp) of LV cables, MV cables, fencing, security perimetral systems, etc. Moreover, it is not necessary to leave special rows for installation, because machinery used is lighter.
Costs of installation: even though string inverters are more expensive than string inverters, they get to save money in some points of the installation. Smart DC boxes can be omitted as long as inverter as inverters have all the protections already included and monitoring is done at string level (this also means that you don't have to use cables to communicate the values from the boxes to the inverter and that you don't have to feed the boxes with power), cabins are smaller, cables are thinner ( thus no use of special machines to install them) and no big cranes are necessary.
Yield of the installation: although EUR efficiency is normally higher in central inverter, every string is optimized with the string inverters solution, thus miss-match, soiling, shadow, eventual breaks, and any other event affecting to string voltage will have minimum effect in the yield of the plant. Furthermore, MPP tracking is more efficient because the curve is "cleaner". They also start working before in the morning and end later in the evening. Availability is also higher because you can have some inverters broken down in a year, but you can change them really quickly if you have some spare inverters and you don't need an advanced technician of the inverter manufacturer to come to the installation. Imagine if 1MW central inverter that stops working on Friday evening and the technician doesn't come until Monday, you lose such a lot of yield.
Maintenance: with string inverters there's no need of maintenance contract with the central inverter manufacturer. You don't pay to ensure an availability because you know that you are going to fulfill it always. Those are big costs within the life of the installation. Furthermore, no preventive maintenance is mandatory, the only operation to be done is cleaning the fans when they are dirty with some compressed air. Furthermore, if you do some maintenance, the time of technical stop is lower with string inverters, because with centrals you have to stop all the installation during some hours while with string you just disconnect it for a short moment whereas you clean the fans.
Designing: with multi-MPPT string concept a better management of the shades is obtained. If lower row of the structure is connected to a different MPPT than upper rows, you can place structures closer, obtaining a best ratio of W/m2. Furthermore, cabins are smaller (and provoke less shadow) and marginal areas of the ground can be used (if the inverter is flexible enough), thus more panels can be installed in the same area, peaking down the costs (€/Wp) of LV cables, MV cables, fencing, security perimetral systems, etc. Moreover, it is not necessary to leave special rows for installation, because machinery used is lighter.
Costs of installation: even though string inverters are more expensive than string inverters, they get to save money in some points of the installation. Smart DC boxes can be omitted as long as inverter as inverters have all the protections already included and monitoring is done at string level (this also means that you don't have to use cables to communicate the values from the boxes to the inverter and that you don't have to feed the boxes with power), cabins are smaller, cables are thinner ( thus no use of special machines to install them) and no big cranes are necessary.
Yield of the installation: although EUR efficiency is normally higher in central inverter, every string is optimized with the string inverters solution, thus miss-match, soiling, shadow, eventual breaks, and any other event affecting to string voltage will have minimum effect in the yield of the plant. Furthermore, MPP tracking is more efficient because the curve is "cleaner". They also start working before in the morning and end later in the evening. Availability is also higher because you can have some inverters broken down in a year, but you can change them really quickly if you have some spare inverters and you don't need an advanced technician of the inverter manufacturer to come to the installation. Imagine if 1MW central inverter that stops working on Friday evening and the technician doesn't come until Monday, you lose such a lot of yield.
Maintenance: with string inverters there's no need of maintenance contract with the central inverter manufacturer. You don't pay to ensure an availability because you know that you are going to fulfill it always. Those are big costs within the life of the installation. Furthermore, no preventive maintenance is mandatory, the only operation to be done is cleaning the fans when they are dirty with some compressed air. Furthermore, if you do some maintenance, the time of technical stop is lower with string inverters, because with centrals you have to stop all the installation during some hours while with string you just disconnect it for a short moment whereas you clean the fans.
Is the physical space limited? Typically you would need to install concrete pads for the central inverter/s. Selecting transform-less string inverters will cut out the need for DC combiner boxes while not sacrificing overall system efficiency. So economically string inverters make perfect sense at this scale. Plus the impact of one of the lower capacity string inverters being off-line is minimal versus one f the central inverters.
In addition the impact of any shade or field temperature variations in the array will be minimized given that typically the new breed of string inverters have more than one MPP trackers.
In addition the impact of any shade or field temperature variations in the array will be minimized given that typically the new breed of string inverters have more than one MPP trackers.
Sir, the space is not limited and the construction of concrete bed is also possible in this case. The only issue is viability of Central Inverter over String Inverter by means of Electrical & economical Efficiency. Can you please help me choosing the right one with exact reason?
Where is this system being installed - what is the interconnection voltage to the grid?
Typically at this relatively small scale I would currently opt for string inverters (transformer-less). The efficiency of good quality string inverters is at least as high as that of the best central inverters. But it is important to understand what the grid interconnection voltage is?
Using string inverters you will be able to switch to AC wiring sooner than would be the case with central inverters. What level of monitoring are you hoping to achieve?
I assume that this is a ground mounted system?
Typically at this relatively small scale I would currently opt for string inverters (transformer-less). The efficiency of good quality string inverters is at least as high as that of the best central inverters. But it is important to understand what the grid interconnection voltage is?
Using string inverters you will be able to switch to AC wiring sooner than would be the case with central inverters. What level of monitoring are you hoping to achieve?
I assume that this is a ground mounted system?
I would ask you to consider a 20KW 3 Phase string inverter with a twist. We are having great success with these projects by delivering a distributed inverter system with module level optimization, and module level monitoring free for life. We are also able to very long strings of 40+ modules, eliminating 50% of EBOS wiring and DC combiner boxes. At 480V Grid with a 60 cell modules, we are less than 25 cents/w. Our standard inverter warranty is 12 years, with spares included at 1MW.
I'd suggest a string inverter.
Many questions arise in the design, but first:
- voltage level
- network access point
- distances
- subsequent operation
Many questions arise in the design, but first:
- voltage level
- network access point
- distances
- subsequent operation
Mr. Ray, this project will be in Andhra pradesh, India. It's now in design stage. After finalizing the design, we'll look for the vendors which suits most. For now, we are considering 300Wp SPV modules with 72cells.
Mr. Chris, yes this a ground mounted project. Monitoring will be done by SCADA pattern. We are actually looking for a solution where we'll have feedback loop for controlling the system as well as monitoring of the plant
Mr. Chris, yes this a ground mounted project. Monitoring will be done by SCADA pattern. We are actually looking for a solution where we'll have feedback loop for controlling the system as well as monitoring of the plant
Manufacturers are selected? Panels, inverters, switch box (AC-DC), layout. The continuation of the design after the earlier of these issues follow. We usually DC optimizer.
Have you checked a large three-phase string inverter with multiple MPPTs?
My recommendation east-west azimuth, three rows - horizontal, I'd sort the modules and put the highest performing modules in the top row. (don't forget a rain drain to collect and reuse rain/cleaning water.)
Think of maintenance and operations, replacing a string inverter may be done more quickly by an unskilled worker, than repairing a central inverter?
If you prefer central inverters, check inverters that allow up to 1500V DC strings to avoid additional losses.
I like DC optimizers for US style residential roofs, but I do doubt that the cost per Watt can be competitive.
Anyway, I do recommend the Photon International Magazine. They test inverters' efficiency and discuss pro's and con's of different architecture. (MPPT's voltage range and cell temperature) Any reason why 72 cells?
By the way, are you ramming posts or using screw piles?
My recommendation east-west azimuth, three rows - horizontal, I'd sort the modules and put the highest performing modules in the top row. (don't forget a rain drain to collect and reuse rain/cleaning water.)
Think of maintenance and operations, replacing a string inverter may be done more quickly by an unskilled worker, than repairing a central inverter?
If you prefer central inverters, check inverters that allow up to 1500V DC strings to avoid additional losses.
I like DC optimizers for US style residential roofs, but I do doubt that the cost per Watt can be competitive.
Anyway, I do recommend the Photon International Magazine. They test inverters' efficiency and discuss pro's and con's of different architecture. (MPPT's voltage range and cell temperature) Any reason why 72 cells?
By the way, are you ramming posts or using screw piles?
Well let me tell u something
first thanks for the useful information
but still, the thin line between string inverters and central inverters are not clarified
there are a couple of points I want to ask about:
1- are central inverters always three phased?
2- are central inverters only to be connected to grid? cant they be used for a large domestic or residential or even stand alone applications?
3- can I consider that the main difference between string inverter and central inverter that the first one always has multiple inputs ( for multiple MPPTs inputs) and the second one has only one input for a single MPPT input
String inverter with 30 KW rated power and a central inverter with the same 30 KW, so whats the main points of difference between those two??
and anyone can help me with a good reference for these issues or even a good reference for designing Large Scale Solar Power Plant?
first thanks for the useful information
but still, the thin line between string inverters and central inverters are not clarified
there are a couple of points I want to ask about:
1- are central inverters always three phased?
2- are central inverters only to be connected to grid? cant they be used for a large domestic or residential or even stand alone applications?
3- can I consider that the main difference between string inverter and central inverter that the first one always has multiple inputs ( for multiple MPPTs inputs) and the second one has only one input for a single MPPT input
String inverter with 30 KW rated power and a central inverter with the same 30 KW, so whats the main points of difference between those two??
and anyone can help me with a good reference for these issues or even a good reference for designing Large Scale Solar Power Plant?
Hi,
If I happen to install solar panels having multiple azimuth orientation, what will become to the inverter efficiency rating? For how many percentage will it drop?
Thanks!
If I happen to install solar panels having multiple azimuth orientation, what will become to the inverter efficiency rating? For how many percentage will it drop?
Thanks!
Chris
I am installing 1 Mw Plant , what is to be choose , whether string invert er or central! I am pumping power to Grid with 11kV, am using a transformer
I am installing 1 Mw Plant , what is to be choose , whether string invert er or central! I am pumping power to Grid with 11kV, am using a transformer
I divided 1MW ito 4x250KWp array for which I've selected 4 Central inverters rated @ 250KW nominal power.
Is the selection is correct or should i Consider string inverters for the 1MW SPV plant?
for string inverters, I chose 20KWp arrays with 20KW(AC nominal output) Inverters.
Please give your professional feedback on this issue.